MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386634584 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2023.3314404

Adaptive Data Transmission and Computing for Vehicles in the Internet-of-Intelligence

2023· article· en· W4386634584 on OpenAlexaff
Yuchen Zhou, F. Richard Yu, Mengmeng Ren, Jian Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLyapunov optimizationComputer scienceReinforcement learningOptimization problemEnergy consumptionData transmissionScheduling (production processes)Mathematical optimizationStochastic optimizationThe InternetDistributed computingArtificial intelligenceEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Efficient scheduling of vehicle resources is of great significance to guarantee vehicle safety and to achieve a higher level of automated driving. Considering the performance fluctuations in data transmission and processing during driving, this paper proposes an adaptive data transmission and computation optimization scheme, where the concept of the Internet-of-Intelligence is introduced to improve the resource decision-making efficiency through knowledge sharing instead of data sharing among vehicles. Specifically, the joint optimization problem is formulated to minimize the long-term energy consumption with the consideration of the average queuing latency guarantees. To provide a stable and fast solution, Lyapunov optimization method is first leveraged to transform the formulated stochastic problem into a series of short-term deterministic optimization subproblems. Afterwards, both the optimization-based solution and the learning-based solution are presented to fully illustrate the performance advantages of Internet-of-Intelligence applied to vehicle networks. The former can output the global optimal solution by iteration, while the latter aims at accelerating the distributed optimization decision-making through building a fast deep reinforcement learning framework based on shared knowledge among vehicles. Simulation results show the advantages of the proposed scheme in stability, energy consumption, and latency, and it also verifies the convergence speed and training accuracy of the proposed fast deep reinforcement learning framework.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicVehicular Ad Hoc Networks (VANETs)French-language works237,207