MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386634666 · doi:10.1109/tii.2023.3312402

A Weighted Deep Neural Network for Processing Measurements for State Estimation

2023· article· en· W4386634666 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Optimization and Stability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutlierEstimatorComputer scienceMissing dataArtificial neural networkNoise (video)Data miningData processingNoise measurementState (computer science)Data qualityArtificial intelligencePattern recognition (psychology)Noise reductionAlgorithmStatisticsMachine learningEngineeringMathematicsDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Processing of power system data containing outliers and noise is important for state estimation. This article aims to improve the quality of data to the state estimator. It addresses noises in the data, viz., normally distributed noise and bias. Along with this, it also handles the outliers, missing data, and time stamping error. In the first stage, outliers, missing data, and time stamping error are handled. In the second stage, data from the first stage pass through the proposed weighted deep neural network that makes use of measurement variance information to reduce noises and bias present in the data. The data after noise reduction are utilized by the state estimation program to find the system states. The proposed method is tested on the IEEE 13-node test feeder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.664

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it