Stability of rotating equilibrium states of fluid deformable surfaces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider rotating equilibrium states of fluid deformable surfaces. These states are characterized by a force balance between centrifugal and bending forces, involve surface Killing vector fields and are independent of surface viscosity. Considering a continuum description based on the incompressible surface Navier‐Stokes equations with bending forces and conserved enclosed volume we numerically demonstrate that these rotating equilibrium states can be reached, but also that these states are not stable. Any perturbation in shape or rotating flow field leads to dissipation and destroys the rotating equilibrium states. After breaking symmetry, evolution reaches other rotating states with a lower energy for which the symmetry axis and the rotation axis are not aligned. Such flow fields could be characterized by three‐dimensional Killing vector fields. However, also these states are also not stable. Based on these numerical results we postulate a cascading mechanism of ‘disturbance ‐ force balance reconfiguration ‐ dissipation’ that contains various rotating equilibrium states as transient configurations but eventually leads to the classical equilibrium shapes of the Helfrich energy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".