MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386640186 · doi:10.1016/j.vgie.2023.07.014

EUS-guided gastroenterostomy using a novel through-the-scope exchangeable dual-balloon enteroclysis catheter: a potentially secure and scalable approach

2023· article· en· W4386640186 on OpenAlexafffund
Yen‐I Chen, Charles Ménard, Mouen A. Khashab, Gary R. May, Corey Miller, Nauzer Forbes, Sheryl White, Ali Bessissow

Bibliographic record

VenueVideoGIE · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEsophageal and GI Pathology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMcGill UniversityJewish General HospitalUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalUniversité de SherbrookeMcGill University Health Centre
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéBoston Scientific Corporation
KeywordsMedicineGastroenterostomyBalloonScope (computer science)RadiologyCatheterBalloon catheterMicrosphereSurgeryInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite accumulating evidence of efficacy in the management of malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO),1-4 EUS-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE) has yet to gain widespread adoption. The lack of a scalable technique and the fear of stent misdeployment has hampered its dissemination. Indeed, even in expert hands, stent misdeployments with EUS-GE have been shown to be as high as 6% to 27%.1,2,5-7 Procedure aids such as the specialized double occlusive balloon enteric tube have been developed. This technique, coined EUS-guided double-balloon-occluded gastrojejunostomy bypass, allows the isolation of the targeted small bowel with 2 balloons and optimal distention of the isolated segment with infusion of fluid using a separate port in the specialized tube.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVideoGIESame topicEsophageal and GI PathologyFrench-language works237,207