Large-scale phenogenomic analysis of human cancers uncovers frequent alterations affecting SMC5/6 complex components in breast cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cancer cells often experience large-scale alterations in genome architecture because of DNA damage and replication stress. Whether mutations in core regulators of chromosome structure can also lead to cancer-promoting loss in genome stability is not fully understood. To address this question, we conducted a systematic analysis of mutations affecting a global regulator of chromosome biology -the SMC5/6 complex- in cancer genomics cohorts. Analysis of 64 959 cancer samples spanning 144 tissue types and 199 different cancer genome studies revealed that the SMC5/6 complex is frequently altered in breast cancer patients. Patient-derived mutations targeting this complex associate with strong phenotypic outcomes such as loss of ploidy control and reduced overall survival. Remarkably, the phenotypic impact of several patient mutations can be observed in a heterozygous context, hence providing an explanation for a prominent role of SMC5/6 mutations in breast cancer pathogenesis. Overall, our findings suggest that genes encoding global effectors of chromosome architecture can act as key contributors to cancer development in humans.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".