Peningkatan Minat Baca Masyarakat Melalui Program Taman Baca Masyarakat “Genangan Ilmu” Di Kecamatan Rangkui Pangkalpinang
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Membaca adalah jendela dunia dan Buku adalah jendela dunia, dan kegiatan membaca buku merupakan suatu cara untuk membuka jendela tersebut agar kita bisa mengetahui lebih tentang dunia yang belum kita tahu sebelumnya. Kegiatan tersebut dapat dilakukan oleh siapa saja, anak-anak, remaja, dewasa, maupun orang-orang yang telah berusia lanjut. Buku merupakan sumber berbagai informasi yang dapat membuka wawasan kita tentang berbagai hal seperti ilmu pengetahuan, ekonomi, sosial, budaya, politik, maupun aspek-aspek kehidupan lainnya. Selain itu, dengan membaca, dapat membantu mengubah masa depan, serta dapat menambah kecerdasan akal dan pikiran kita.Tanpa kita sadari, manfaat membaca buku dapat memberikan banyak inspirasi bagi kita. Namun sayangnya kegiatan membaca buku akhir-akhir ini telah banyak diabaikan berbagai kalangan dengan alasan kesibukan, maupun karena adanya media yang lebih praktis untuk mendapatkan informasi seperti televisi, radio, maupun media internet. Oleh sebab itu teman-teman Backpacker Teaching Bangka Belitung Mmeberikan solusi dengan mendirikan taman baca masyarakat “Genangan Ilmu” di kecamatan Rangkui Kota Pangkalpinang untuk menumbuhkan minat serta budaya membaca dikalangan masyarakat Kata kunci : minat, baca, taman bacaan
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.063 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".