How Healthism Can Change the Consumerism in China's Retail Industry： A Study on the Lululemon Ad Campaigns and Branding in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the rapid expansion of the Chinese consumer market, more and more Western brands are bringing their unique ideologies and concepts to the Chinese market and trying to change the Chinese consumers consumption concepts. Healthism is a typical example. As a representative brand of healthism in the western world, Lululemon has launched a series of promotional activities on healthism in the China market. This article will explore the impact of Lululemon on China's retail consumer industry through healthism advertising through in-depth interviews, and study how Lululemon’s branding in China can be understood in the context of a new market cultural dimensions at the post-economic reform China. This paper has explored the entry of Lululemon in China in the context of the consumer society and a challenge to traditional privileged discourses. This paper conclude that the healthism concepts that Lululemon spreads in China can drive consumers accept the healthism ideology and also consume on the healthism related products.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".