Bibliographic record
Abstract
In addition to suffering from symptoms, individuals with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) also suffer from self-stigma and public stigmatization due to PTSD. This article examines the stigma that patients with PTSD usually experience, and whether these stigmas are related to the identity, economic status, and other co-occurring mental illnesses of patients. Through reviewing the previous studies, this paper discusses the causes, forms and effects of stigma. In addition, it was found that individualized psychotherapy programs and mindfulness can be effective in alleviating the stress of stigma for PTSD patients. And social acceptance and support for the PTSD community can be increased by managing content about the disorder on social media and changing the content framework of news organizations, such as increasing anti-stigma and introducing knowledge about PTSD. The social acceptance and support of the PTSD community can be increased by, for example, increasing anti-stigma and knowledge about PTSD. Future research should focus on addressing the stigma associated with mental illnesses such as PTSD and addressing the psychological damage caused by stigma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".