MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Fast Active Cell Balancing Strategy for Lithium-ion Battery Packs

2023· article· en· W4386646121 on OpenAlexaff
Mohammad Abareshi, Erfan Sadeghi, Yousef Naghibzadeh, Mohsen Hamzeh, Mehrdad Saif

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery packState of chargeElectrificationBattery (electricity)Computer scienceVoltLithium-ion batteryProcess (computing)Automotive engineeringLoad balancing (electrical power)VoltageElectrical engineeringElectricityEngineeringPower (physics)Grid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Development of reliable and efficient battery management systems (BMS) is determinant in the path of vehicles towards electrification. In this work, we speed up the cell balancing process of a Li-ion battery pack by introducing a novel state-of-charge (SOC) balancing strategy. The strategy takes advantage of the existing 12 volts battery in electric and hybrid vehicles as an auxiliary dc bus assisting with the SOC balancing process for the Li-ion battery pack. The proposed method is capable of conveying energy for up to five adjacent cells for SOC balancing. The simulation results on a string of 8 series cells confirm the effectiveness of the proposed strategy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.436
Threshold uncertainty score0.557

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207