MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386647452 · doi:10.3138/ngcr.13-003

Brian Jungen: Inspiring a Practice of Indigenous Art / Brian Jungen : inspirer une pratique de l’art autochtone

2023· article· fr· W4386647452 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Gerald McMaster

Bibliographic record

VenueNational Gallery of Canada Review · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousArtSociologyHumanitiesBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Brian Jungen is a new kind of Indigenous contemporary artist, one whose work and practice are as comfortable in the art gallery or museum as they are in an Indigenous community context.T rough a practice of redefning, he places reserve (rural) and art gallery (urban) spaces into co-existence.In this meditation, I focus on a 2012 f lm-work called Modest Livelihood, in which Jungen collaborates with fellow artist Duane Linklater.He and Jungen are counted among a growing number of Indigenous artists whose decolonial actions redefne what Indigenous contemporary art can be.T e f lm documents the two artists on a moose hunt on Dane-zaa treaty lands, in northern British Columbia (BC).Beginning with the hunt, we move from the reserve to a sophisticated art gallery, where the f lm, Modest Livelihood, would later be shown for the viewer.T is processual action reveals the interconnected realities present in the work of art.I would like to posit that the depiction of the hunt is a reformulation of the creative act, wherein the making of a work of art for an art gallery is only a small part of the greater whole.Starting from Fort St. John on a backcountry vehicle, then later on foot, the two artists travel through stunning northern landscapes.Before they eventually locate the moose they seek, they make their way through areas that have been impacted by industrialization.Jungen's uncle, Elder Jack Askoty, accompanies the duo and shares his knowledge and the history of the land.To appreciate the signifcance of this f lm, it is worth taking a moment to examine the context in which it is set -historically, culturally, and geographically.To begin with, the work takes its title from a 1999 Supreme Court of Canada ruling that reasserted treaty rights for First Nations to hunt only for the purpose of a "moderate livelihood, " and not for wealth accumulation.Since the ruling, the rights protected under the Constitution of Canada include activities, practices, and traditions that are fundamental to the distinctive cultures of Indigenous Peoples.While treaty rights may be more commonly associated with traditional practices such as hunting or fshing, it is arguable that making art, or the creative use of traditional or Indigenous knowledge in a visual format, is also a demonstration of one's rights.T ese inherent rights are based on traditional activities that were practised well before contact with Europeans, yet they can be carried out using modern methods.For example, if hunting used to be done using a bow and arrow and it is now done with a rife and ammunition, the right to hunt does not change.Conversely, we may apply this same rationale to the production of artworks using traditional knowledge through new media and technologies.With Modest Livelihood, we can understand Jungen and Linklater's collaboration as an urgent decolonial act -a reclamation and reassertion of their treaty rights amid a renegotiation of attachments to a sense of shared experience and place.Further to this notion of collaboration, the presence of Jungen's uncle as both guide and mentor speaks to the passage of Indigenous knowledge across generations.Te idea for this collaborative work was born out of informal conversations between the two artists, who, afer speaking over cofee during Linklater's residency at the Banf Centre, recognized similarities in how they had grown up, the kinds of geography 28 2023

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.790
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0130.015
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0120.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueNational Gallery of Canada ReviewSame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207