Near-Infrared/pH Dual-Responsive Nanosponges Encapsulating Gold Nanorods for Synergistic Chemo-phototherapy of Lung Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Combined chemo-photothermal therapy (CT-PTT) based on gold nanorods (AuNRs) loaded with chemotherapies has been recently introduced as a promising anticancer therapy with relatively lower side effects and higher efficacy over individual therapeutic approaches. We fabricated β-cyclodextrin-based nanosponges encapsulating PEGylated gold nanorods and doxorubicin (DOX), AuNR-S-PEG.β-CD NS-DOX, comprehensively characterized it using TEM, SEM, FE-SEM, FITR, and DLS and then evaluated it for CT-PTT versus the respective photothermal, AuNR-S-PEG.β-CD NS, and chemotherapy DOX. The synthesized AuNR-S-PEG.β-CD NS nanocomposite exhibited high photothermal conversion efficiency and high drug loading capacity based on the porous structure of the nanosponges. The drug-loaded nanocomposites, AuNR-S-PEG.β-CD NS-DOX, showed pH/NIR dual-responsive drug release behaviors, good biocompatibility, and efficient uptake into A549 lung cancer cells, as well as higher efficiency in killing cancer cells than single chemo- or photothermal therapy. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate AuNR-S-PEG.β-CD NS-DOX nanocomposites as a promising candidate for combined chemo-photothermal therapy of lung cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".