MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386649037 · doi:10.14393/rep-2023-69022

Sobre precarização e ressentimento

2023· article· en· W4386649037 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ana Lúcia Vieira, Renata Cecília Estormovski

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Educação Popular · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The objective of this essay is to discuss the attacks suffered by public school teachers by other workers during the Covid-19 pandemic, relating this situation to the process of precarious work that, in this particular period of capitalism, enhances the subjective constitution of resentment. To achieve this, a qualitative and bibliographical study is carried out, with references that include Dardot and Laval (2016), Antunes (2000; 2009; 2018; 2020), Alves (2007), and Kehl (2020). Composed of two central sections, the writing elucidates the process of precariousness that affects workers in capitalism and relates it to the constitution of resentment, which foments clashes between workers. From the discussion, the role of education in recognizing and strengthening struggles against the subordination of subjects to a work format that objectifies them is invoked, with humanization being the opportunity for change.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.853
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.391
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Educação PopularSame topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207