MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386661731 · doi:10.7202/1081887ar

Two Neuter Pronouns in Picard

2021· article· en· W4386661731 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Julie Auger

Bibliographic record

VenueArborescences Revue d études françaises · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMedieval European Literature and History
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCliticLinguisticsRomance languagesPronounPersonal pronounVariety (cybernetics)Null (SQL)Subject (documents)MathematicsPhilosophyComputer scienceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the Vimeu variety of Picard, a Gallo-Romance closely related to French, three different neuter subject clitic pronouns are found:a,ch’, and a null form. This paper examines the distribution of these forms in contemporary texts in order to determine the extent to which these pronouns resemble those found in other Gallo-Romance languages or whether their source must be sought in colloquial varieties of French. We argue, based on phonological, syntactic, and semantic criteria, that the French origin better accounts for the similarities between the two varieties. Based on their syntactic distribution, we argue that the three forms represent two different pronouns,aandch’, that the null form is an allomorph ofain certain phonological contexts, and that the distinction betweena/Ø andch’constitutes an innovation in Picard.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.073

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.006
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArborescences Revue d études françaisesSame topicMedieval European Literature and HistoryFrench-language works237,207