MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386663626 · doi:10.54434/candj.77

Naturopathic Considerations in Supporting Older Adults with Cancer

2021· article· en· W4386663626 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sukriti Bhardwaj, Daniel P. Lander

Bibliographic record

VenueCAND Journal · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicComplementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolypharmacyMedicineQuality of life (healthcare)CancerPopulationNaturopathyCancer treatmentGerontologyGeriatric oncologyIntensive care medicineAlternative medicineInternal medicineEnvironmental healthNursingPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When supporting the older adult with cancer, it is essential to account for the unique concerns within this population beyond cancer type and stage. Common concerns in this population include numerous comorbidities, polypharmacy, nutritional status, treatment tolerance, pain management and quality of life. A comprehensive geriatric assessment is essential for elucidating salient concerns among older adults with cancer as it reduces the risk of treatment toxicities and improves treatment outcomes. Using the results of geriatric assessments, naturopathic doctors can recommend therapies to optimize quality of life and prognosis, specifically in the older adult population with cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCAND JournalSame topicComplementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesFrench-language works237,207