Heart Cell Transplantation Improves Heart Function in Dilated Cardiomyopathic Hamsters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background —Little is known about the effect of heart cell transplantation into the dilated cardiomyopathic myocardium. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of heart cell transplantation into dilated cardiomyopathic hamsters. Methods and Results —Ventricular heart cells were isolated from 4-week-old BIO 53.58 hamsters and cultured for 2 weeks before transplantation. The cells were labeled with bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) before transplantation for identification. Adult hamsters (17 weeks old) were used as recipients. Heart cells (4×10 6 cells) or culture medium was transplanted into the left ventricular free wall (transplantation and control groups, respectively, n=12 each). Sham-operated hamsters (n=12) underwent the surgery but not the transplantation. Cyclosporine A was administered subcutaneously to all hamsters daily after the operation. Four weeks after the transplantation, heart function was evaluated with the use of a Langendorff preparation. Histology showed severe focal myocardial necrosis in all groups. BrdU-stained tissue was found at the cell transplantation sites. The transplanted hearts had greater ( P <0.001) developed pressures at all balloon volumes and improved dP/dt (transplantation 915±253 versus control 453±120 and sham 530±187 mm Hg/s, P <0.001, balloon volume of 15 μL). No differences in ventricular function were found between control and sham-operated hamsters. Conclusions —The transplanted ventricular heart cells formed cardiac-like tissue in cardiomyopathic myocardium and improved its contractile function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".