The Concept of Threshold Inflation and How Threshold Inflation Relates to Economic Growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The relationship between inflation rate and economic growth has resulted in their correlation becoming a subject in an extensive body of empirical and theoretical studies. Many studies have focused on how inflation relates to positive or negative growth. A gap exists in the threshold value beyond which this correlation works. The study fills this gap by using the threshold model to understand a threshold value beyond which inflation negatively impacts economic growth. The research examines the positive and negative associations between inflation and economic growth, the significant threshold value of the inflation rate beyond which it adversely affects growth, and the variation of threshold value and impact across different countries and economies in different developmental stages. The method involves analyzing secondary sources to establish a theoretical framework on the negative relationship between inflation and economic growth and an empirical framework on the relationship between high and low inflation rates on economic growth and threshold values and their impact on economic growth. The method also involves examining practical examples as a strategy to show that there is a variation in inflation threshold value. The concept of threshold inflation shows that there is a value beyond which an economy of a certain country, irrespective of developmental stage, negatively affects economic growth.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".