Les usages sociaux des technologies de l’information et de communication chez les étudiant·e·s internationaux et internationales en période de confinement lié à la pandémie de la COVID-19 au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article explore les usages sociaux des TIC et leurs répercussions sur la qualité de vie des étudiant·e·s internationales et internationaux (ÉI) dans le contexte du confinement instauré au Québec en 2020 en réponse à la pandémie de COVID-19. Des entrevues semi-dirigées menées en ligne auprès de quarante ÉI ont permis de comprendre que les ÉI recourent aux médias sociaux à des fins de communication et de support de l’entourage et utilisent des applications à des fins multiples (informations, divertissement, achats, jeux). Les nouvelles plateformes de visioconférence ont joué un rôle significatif en permettant la participation à des activités en ligne et au maintien des relations avec la famille et les ami·e·s. Finalement, les TIC ont permis de supporter les conditions de confinement, mais elles ont aussi entrainé des répercussions sur la qualité de vie évaluées comme problématiques (augmentation du temps passé en ligne, dépendance, anxiété, fatigue).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".