MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Rhabdomyosarcoma: Current Therapy, Challenges, and Future Approaches to Treatment Strategies

2023· preprint· en· W4386697356 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Zarrabi, David Perrin, Mahboubeh Kavoosi, Micah Sommer, Serap Sezen, Parvaneh Mehrbod, Bhavya Bhushan, Filip Machaj, Jakub Rosik, Philip Kawalec, Saba Afifi, Seyed Mohammadreza Bolandi, Peyman Koleini, Mohsen Taheri, Tayyebeh Madrakian, Marek Łoś, Benjamin B. Lindsey, Nilüfer Çakır, Atefeh Zarepour, Kiavash Hushmandi, Ali Fallah, Bahattin Koç, Mazaher Ahmadi, Susan E. Logue, Gorka Orive, Stevan Pecic, Joseph W. Gordon, Saeid Ghavami

Bibliographic record

VenuePreprints.org · 2023
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsCancerCare ManitobaMcGill UniversityResearch Institute in Oncology and HematologyChildren's Hospital Research Institute of ManitobaUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRhabdomyosarcomaZebrafishMedicineRadiation therapyDiseaseSarcomaChemotherapyAlveolar rhabdomyosarcomaAutophagyOncologyCancer researchInternal medicinePathologyApoptosisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhabdomyosarcoma is a rare cancer arising in skeletal muscle that typically impacts children and young adults. It is a worldwide challenge in child health as treatment outcomes for metastatic and recurrent disease still pose a major concern for both basic and clinical scientists. The treatment strategies for rhabdomyosarcoma include multi-agent chemotherapies after surgical resection with or without ionization radiotherapy. In this comprehensive review, we first provide a detailed clinical understanding of rhabdomyosarcoma including its classification and subtypes, diagnosis, and treatment strategies. Later we focus on chemotherapy strategies for this childhood sarcoma and discuss the impact of three mechanisms that are involved in chemotherapy response including apoptosis, macro-autophagy, and the unfolded protein response. Finally, we discuss in vivo mouse and zebrafish models, and in vitro 3-dimensional bioengineering models of Rhabdomyosarcoma to screen future therapeutic approaches and promote muscle regeneration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.512
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.121 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePreprints.orgSame topicSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207