MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386697636 · doi:10.47854/anthropen.v1i1.52071

Big data

2023· article· fr· W4386697636 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Vincent Duclos

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropen · 2023
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Cultural and Historical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBig dataHumanitiesDictionPhilosophySoulSociologyEpistemologyComputer scienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Big data désigne un mode de collecte et d'analyse de données volumineuses, mais surtout un rapport à la connaissance caractérisé par une emphase sur la découverte de corrélations et la prédiction de l'avenir. Le big data soulève des enjeux sociaux et politiques importants, qui en font un objet privilégié de l'analyse critique. Mais le big data provoque également une réflexion quant à la pratique anthropologique, à son statut épistémologique et aux possibilités (ou non) de collaborations interdisciplinaires.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0090.015
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0130.010
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1210.108

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.434
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.040 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropenSame topicDiverse Cultural and Historical StudiesFrench-language works237,207