Admittance-Based Modeling of Grid-Following Converters for Time-Domain Simulations of Multi-Converter Electrical Power Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurate and efficient time-domain simulations are indispensable for integrating converter-interfaced energy resources into the evolving power grid. This paper proposes an admittance-based model (ABM) of grid-following converters (GFCs) for numerically efficient time-domain simulations. Specifically, the linear components of GFCs with fast dynamics are formulated as transfer functions, while the slow nonlinear components are kept without any model reduction. The transfer function- based admittance formulation preserves/includes the dynamic characteristic between the desired input/output variables of the fast sub-system. The proposed ABM also achieves an enhanced interfacing with external networks and does not require an extra time-step delay as opposed to the conventional implementation of state-space average-value models (SS-AVMs) of converters. The proposed ABM of the GFCs is validated through computer simulations and compared with the SS-AVM. It is shown that the proposed ABM is able to use larger time-steps and achieve higher numerical accuracy compared to SS-AVM, making it capable of simulating larger multi-converter systems using specific available simulation hardware.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".