Indigenous corporate responsibility and financial performance
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impact of Corporate Social Responsibility with respect to Indigenous (CSRI) initiatives and issues on financial performance was studied using several CSRI metrics, both innovated (where necessary) and pre-existing (where possible). We find that CSRI initiatives based on dollar expenditures and firm website scores are positively associated with financial performance while increase to reputation risk has a negative impact. We also find that a CSRI score can only be moderated by an overall ESG score that is substantially stronger than the CSRI metric. In a world that increasingly emphasizes the importance of ‘truth and reconciliation’ with its Indigenous populations while meeting environmental resource needs, we must seek a path that recognizes and respects Indigenous rights and cultural practices. Providing well developed, consistently measured and acceptable CSRI metrics and assessing their impact on firm financial performance is a crucial step in this reconciliation process. This paper makes important contributions to that goal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it