MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386699523 · doi:10.56885/hfsd38870

Enhancing Diabetes Care And Preventing Foot Ulcers In Indigenous Communities: Two Examples Of A Holistic Approach In The Province of Quebec

2023· article· en· W4386699523 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Virginie Blanchette, Loredana Talos, Stéfanny Bleau, Karine Lamothe, Marie-Hélène Garneau

Bibliographic record

VenueLimb Preservation Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousDiabetic footMedicineDiabetes mellitusFoot (prosody)Culturally sensitiveDiabetes managementNursingType 2 diabetesPsychologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is a review of a session at the virtual Limb Preservation Symposia that recognizes a dual initiative undertaken to address diabetes management and prevent diabetic foot ulcers within Indigenous communities in the Province of Quebec (Canada). It highlights two intertwined projects: "Culturally Adapted Diabetes Management and Interprofessional Care" and "Preventing Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Pilot Project." Both initiatives underscore the importance of culturally adapted care, patient engagement, and collaborative approaches in addressing diabetes management and preventing diabetic foot ulcers within Indigenous communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLimb Preservation JournalSame topicDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207