MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386708306 · doi:10.18280/isi.280410

Hybrid Deep Learning Approach and Word2Vec Feature Expansion for Cyberbullying Detection on Indonesian Twitter

2023· article· en· W4386708306 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Irfan Ahmad Asqolani, Erwin Budi Setiawan

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWord2vecIndonesianFeature (linguistics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceDeep learningData sciencePsychologyPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Twitter, a social media platform that enables users to generate, post, update, and peruse brief messages known as tweets, unfortunately, is frequently misused for circulating negative content encompassing cyberbullying.The detrimental effects of cyberbullying on the mental well-being of victims are profound, with extreme cases culminating in suicide due to severe stress.Consequently, preventive measures, inclusive of the development of a cyberbullying detection system for Twitter, are imperative.This study introduces a hybrid deep learning approach, incorporating feature expansion with Word2Vec and feature extraction with TF-IDF, for constructing a cyberbullying detection system tailored to the Indonesian language on Twitter.A sequence of test scenarios was executed on a system developed using a dataset of 29,085 Indonesian tweets.The outcomes of this study demonstrate that the highest accuracy was achieved by the CNN-LSTM hybrid model with an accuracy of 79.26%, and the LSTM-CNN hybrid model with an accuracy of 79.48%.These findings substantiate that the amalgamation of hybrid models, Word2Vec for feature augmentation, and TF-IDF for feature extraction, yields superior accuracy compared to other deep learning models.Consequently, this study has succeeded in identifying cyberbullying on Twitter, contributing to the development of a healthier social media environment for users.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.986
Threshold uncertainty score0.886

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicHate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionFrench-language works237,207