Real‐time liver motion estimation via deep learning‐based angle‐agnostic X‐ray imaging
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Real-time liver imaging is challenged by the short imaging time (within hundreds of milliseconds) to meet the temporal constraint posted by rapid patient breathing, resulting in extreme under-sampling for desired 3D imaging. Deep learning (DL)-based real-time imaging/motion estimation techniques are emerging as promising solutions, which can use a single X-ray projection to estimate 3D moving liver volumes by solved deformable motion. However, such techniques were mostly developed for a specific, fixed X-ray projection angle, thereby impractical to verify and guide arc-based radiotherapy with continuous gantry rotation. PURPOSE: To enable deformable motion estimation and 3D liver imaging from individual X-ray projections acquired at arbitrary X-ray scan angles, and to further improve the accuracy of single X-ray-driven motion estimation. METHODS: We developed a DL-based method, X360, to estimate the deformable motion of the liver boundary using an X-ray projection acquired at an arbitrary gantry angle (angle-agnostic). X360 incorporated patient-specific prior information from planning 4D-CTs to address the under-sampling issue, and adopted a deformation-driven approach to deform a prior liver surface mesh to new meshes that reflect real-time motion. The liver mesh motion is solved via motion-related image features encoded in the arbitrary-angle X-ray projection, and through a sequential combination of rigid and deformable registration modules. To achieve the angle agnosticism, a geometry-informed X-ray feature pooling layer was developed to allow X360 to extract angle-dependent image features for motion estimation. As a liver boundary motion solver, X360 was also combined with priorly-developed, DL-based optical surface imaging and biomechanical modeling techniques for intra-liver motion estimation and tumor localization. RESULTS: With geometry-aware feature pooling, X360 can solve the liver boundary motion from an arbitrary-angle X-ray projection. Evaluated on a set of 10 liver patient cases, the mean (± s.d.) 95-percentile Hausdorff distance between the solved liver boundary and the "ground-truth" decreased from 10.9 (±4.5) mm (before motion estimation) to 5.5 (±1.9) mm (X360). When X360 was further integrated with surface imaging and biomechanical modeling for liver tumor localization, the mean (± s.d.) center-of-mass localization error of the liver tumors decreased from 9.4 (± 5.1) mm to 2.2 (± 1.7) mm. CONCLUSION: X360 can achieve fast and robust liver boundary motion estimation from arbitrary-angle X-ray projections for real-time imaging guidance. Serving as a surface motion solver, X360 can be integrated into a combined framework to achieve accurate, real-time, and marker-less liver tumor localization.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".