MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386710964 · doi:10.3847/psj/ace82a

Radar Observations of the Arid Meteor Shower Outburst from Comet 15P/Finlay

2023· article· en· W4386710964 on OpenAlexaff
Diego Janches, Juan Sebastián Bruzzone, R. Weryk, J. L. Hormaechea, C. Brunini

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Planetary Science Journal · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstro and Planetary Science
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersPlanetary Science DivisionNASA Engineering and Safety Center
KeywordsMeteor showerMeteor (satellite)MeteoroidCometSouthern HemispherePhysicsAstronomyMeteorologyGeologyEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesAstrophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We report on observations of the anticipated, first time occurrence, Arid meteor shower produced by comet 15P/Finlay. This comet, which has not been noteworthy for over a century, produced two major outbursts of activity during perihelion passage between 2014 December and 2015 January. Various authors predicted that Earth would cross the resulting ejecta on 2021 October 6–7 UT with a radiant in the constellation Ara, optimally placed to be observed from the Southern Hemisphere. We observed two outbursts using the Southern Argentina Agile Meteor Radar-Orbital System: one on 2021 September 29 and a second more dominant peak on 2021 October 7, centered around α = 260.°34, δ = −57.°63 and α = 255.°01, δ = −48.°47, respectively. The 6.5 mag limit flux and zenithal hourly rates were 0.073 meteors km −2 hr −1 and 491 hr −1 , respectively. The time of occurrence of the two detected peaks are in good agreement with predictions of this shower reported by several authors, confirming the validity of the models used for the predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Planetary Science JournalSame topicAstro and Planetary ScienceFrench-language works237,207