Formation of Female Professional Personnel in Eastern Siberia in the last quarter of the XIX – early XX centuries
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On the basis of archival and published sources, the article examines the process of formation of female professional personnel on the basis of a concrete example of the society of Eastern Siberia in the last quarter of the XIX -early XX centuries, analyzes the types of their labor activity.The data of statistical sources in the studied period are systematized and grouped according to the forms of employment of graduates of higher educational institutions.The authors come to the following conclusions on the example of Eastern Siberia.In general, the educational and professional mobility of Siberians was low.The opportunity to build an independent career in traditionally male fields of activity, breaking away from the parental family and without the support of her husband, was not possible for many.The majority of educated girls faced misunderstanding and lack of support due to the predominance of traditional patriarchal beliefs in Russian society.All the more admired are those Siberian bestuzhevki who were able not only to realize their knowledge in their professional activities, but also to serve as an example to the next generations of young girls who risked radically changing their fate by going for education from the hinterland to the center of a huge country.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it