MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386715973 · doi:10.18280/isi.280404

A Novel Hybrid Approach for Daily Tourism Arrival Forecasting: The PROPHET-Bayesian Gaussian Process-Forward Neural Network Model

2023· article· en· W4386715973 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Samya Bouhaddour, Chaimae Saadi, Ibrahim Bouabdallaoui, Mohammed Sbihi, Fatima Guerouate

Bibliographic record

VenueIngénierie des systèmes d information · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTraffic Prediction and Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique
KeywordsArtificial neural networkGaussian processBayesian probabilityComputer scienceTourismProcess (computing)EconometricsArtificial intelligenceGaussianMachine learningGeographyMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the profound impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the tourism sector, accurate forecasting of daily visitor arrivals has become paramount.Introduced herein is a novel PROPHET-Bayesian Gaussian Process-Forward Neural Network (PROPHET-BGP-FNN) model, an advanced deep learning (DL) approach, devised for this purpose.This model uniquely integrates the PROPHET model with a deep neural network, merging BGP and FNN, thereby enabling the detection of both linear and nonlinear data attributes.Linear characteristics are discerned by the PROPHET component.Contrary to traditional methodologies which predominantly employ monthly or quarterly datasets, this approach harnesses the precision of daily data, thereby offering a timely and refined forecast.Given the complexity of daily tourist demand data, which manifests a blend of linear and nonlinear patterns, the conventional frameworks often fall short in representation.Through an application on Hawaiian tourism data spanning 2017 to 2021, 80% of which was employed for training and the remainder for validation, it was observed that the PROPHET-BGP-FNN model surpassed benchmark models, including Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM)-SARIMAX-PROPHET, with a remarkable forecast accuracy of 97%.This investigation underscores the viability of integrating high-frequency data with cutting-edge machine learning (ML) methodologies for a more precise forecast in tourism demand.Such insights hold significant implications for strategic decision-making, thereby enhancing the tourism sector's economic viability and competitive stance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIngénierie des systèmes d informationSame topicTraffic Prediction and Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207