MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386718042 · doi:10.1353/bcc.2023.a907072

Into the Bright Open: A Secret Garden Remix by Cherie Dimaline (review)

2023· article· en· W4386718042 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aaren Tucker

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the Center for Children's Books./Bulletin of the Center for Children's Books · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFriendshipAdventureArt historyArtHistorySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Into the Bright Open: A Secret Garden Remix by Cherie Dimaline Aaren Tucker Dimaline, Cherie Into the Bright Open: A Secret Garden Remix. Feiwel, 2023 [288p] Trade ed. ISBN 9781250842657 $19.99 E-book ed. ISBN 9781250842664 $11.99 Reviewed from digital galleys R Gr. 6-9 When Mary Craven is orphaned at fifteen, she leaves Toronto to live at her uncle's mansion in the Ontario wilderness. There, the surly, imperious Mary is shocked by the frank and informal manner of her uncle's servants. She's equally surprised to discover she has a cousin, Olive, whom she never knew anything about. Mary's loneliness dissipates as her friendship with Olive and other new companions grows stronger, but their peaceful life is disrupted by the return of Olive's stepmother. Suddenly, Olive's illness worsens, and she is locked in her room again while Mary's adventures with her new friends are curtailed. Having finally found the love she craved, Mary now must learn to fight for those she cares for and uncover her family's buried secrets. Dimaline's adaptation of the classic novel The Secret Garden ages up the protagonist and adds a sinister twist, but it still pays homage to its inspiration. Mary retains the sour, contrary disposition of the original, and Dimaline (Funeral Songs for Dying Girls, BCCB 03/23) preserves the story's roots as Mary learns to be kinder and stronger thanks to the love and friendship of good yet humble people. Dimaline's subtle, absorbing prose will surely draw readers in and introduce a new generation to the story of a lonely young girl finding her place in the world. Copyright © 2023 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.117

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0350.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the Center for Children's Books./Bulletin of the Center for Children's BooksSame topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207