MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386725991 · doi:10.1080/07370016.2023.2257199

Assessing Alzheimer’s Disease Knowledge and Cognitive Risk Among a Rural Older Afro-Caribbean Cohort

2023· article· en· W4386725991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Community Health Nursing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on AgingNational Institutes of HealthFlorida Department of Health
KeywordsDementiaMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentGerontologyCohortPopulationCognitionRural areaDiseaseCohort studyAlzheimer's diseaseClinical psychologyPsychiatryInternal medicineEnvironmental healthPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose Older, rural Afro-Caribbeans are a growing subset of the Black population who face increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias (ADRD), but research targeting ADRD is scarce in this group. The purpose of this study was to investigate dementia risk among older Afro-Caribbeans living in a rural area. We also examined age, sex, and years of education, and knowledge about Alzheimer’s disease as potential predictors of dementia risk.Design A pre-post, correlational design was employed.Methods Cognitive screenings were conducted using Nasreddine’s Mini-MoCA, with tests of language fluency/orientation/recall, and linear regression analysis. A basic knowledge of Alzheimer’s disease survey (BKAD) was also administered.Findings A total of 55 Afro-Caribbean participants (67.0 +10.8y (M ± SD), 65.5% with 10y or less of education residing in a rural area within the last 20 years were included.Over 50% of the convenience sample scored in the cognitive risk range. Significant associations were found between Mini-MoCA Total and Language scores and education (p < 0.01). Further, there was a significant change from pretest to posttest in BKAD scores. BKAD pretest and posttest scores were also significantly higher for those without dementia risk based on the Mini-MoCA Total.Conclusion While the Mini-MoCA showed good reliability in less-educated older Afro-Caribbeans, scores were strongly dependent on years of education. Offering a limited intervention resulted in increased BKAD scores in this Afro-Caribbean sample, and a low BKAD score was associated with a higher dementia risk category.Clinical evidence This study contributes to the limited but growing body of research about Alzheimer’s disease knowledge, cognitive risk, and dementia detection among Afro-Caribbeans. The use of language-neutral cognitive assessments is recommended among rural older immigrants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.238
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.444
Teacher spread0.385 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it