O papel da rememoração na construção de significados em uma aula experimental sobre titulação ácido-base
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The role of remembrance in the construction of meanings in an experimental class on acid-base titration.Acidic and basic substances have always been used in everyday life.Over the years such substances have been studied in order to understand their behavior, properties and chemical transformations.Nowadays it is one of the contents studied in the classroom, involving the definitions of Arrhenius, Bronsted-Lowry and Lewis.In this way, this research proposed, through an experimental class in the remote format, to analyze the construction of meanings about the content involving the remembrance process with higher education students of a undergraduation in Chemistry, considering that the remembered proposed by Frederic Bartlett.Through the results obtained, it was possible to observe that most of the students presented a previous knowledge of the content that, from the mediation of the experimental activity, was being resignified from the identification of mnemonic changes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it