Testimonios en cursos multilingües de humanidades digitales transfronterizas y transnacionales.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este artículo surge de la mesa redonda “A Decolonial-Postcolonial Approach: Digital Humanities Pedagogy in Modern Language” presentado en DH Unbound 2022. El trabajo aborda el caso de dos cursos de humanidades digitales ofrecidos en línea por causa de la pandemia para estudiantes en departamentos de humanidades en la Universidad de Kansas en el 2021 con el fin de explicar el diseño y las prácticas del programa de dos cursos cuyo contenido se enfoca en un entendimiento crítico e interseccional de las humanidades digitales y estudios hispánicos con una aproximación decolonial feminista. Los autores que tomaron los cursos como estudiantes en programa de estudios graduados incluyen en este artículo sus experiencias al aprender nuevas metodologías, destrezas digitales y crear una producción digital crítica a partir de culturas de habla hispana. Este trabajo contribuye a la conversación actual de nuevas pedagogías ya que cómo estudiantes subgraduados y graduados en departamentos de humanidades, en este caso específico de estudios en Lenguas Modernas. Existe el interés y la necesidad de amplificar los campos de estudio ofreciendo cursos y oportunidades que le permitan al estudiante explorar nuevas formas de investigación y pedagogía al incorporar conocimientos personales y temas sociopolíticos mediante una intersección con prácticas y herramientas digitales.    This paper arises from the roundtable "A Decolonial-Postcolonial Approach: Digital Humanities Pedagogy in Modern Language" presented at DH Unbound 2022. The paper addresses the case of two digital humanities courses offered online because of the pandemic for students in Humanities departments at the University of Kansas in 2021 in order to explain the program design and practices of two courses whose content focuses on a critical and intersectional understanding of Digital Humanities and Hispanic studies with a feminist decolonial approach. The authors who took the courses as graduate students include in this article their experiences learning new methodologies, digital skills, and creating critical digital production from Spanish-speaking cultures. This work contributes to the current conversation of new pedagogies as undergraduate and graduate students in Humanities departments, in this specific case Modern Language Studies. There is an interest and need to amplify fields of study by offering courses and opportunities that allow students to explore new forms of inquiry and pedagogy by incorporating personal knowledge and sociopolitical issues through an intersection with digital practices and tools.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".