MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386738085 · doi:10.1112/jlms.12815

A functor for constructing R$R$‐matrices in the category O$\mathcal {O}$ of Borel quantum loop algebras

2023· article· en· W4386738085 on OpenAlexafffund
Théo Pinet

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the London Mathematical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsMathematicsFunctorIsomorphism (crystallography)SubalgebraPure mathematicsRing (chemistry)IrreducibilityFactorizationInvertible matrixTensor productTensor (intrinsic definition)Interpretation (philosophy)Algebra over a fieldLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We tackle the problem of constructing ‐matrices for the category associated to the Borel subalgebra of an arbitrary untwisted quantum loop algebra . For this, we define an invertible exact functor from the category linked to to the one linked to . This functor is compatible with tensor products, preserves irreducibility, and interchanges the subcategories and of Hernandez and Leclerc ( Algebra Number Theory 10 (2016) 2015–2052). We construct ‐matrices for by applying on the braidings already found for by Hernandez ( Represent. Theory 26 (2022) 179–210). We also use the factorization of the latter intertwiners in terms of stable maps to deduce an analogous factorization for our new braidings. We finally obtain as byproducts new relations for the Grothendieck ring as well as a functorial interpretation of a remarkable ring isomorphism of Hernandez–Leclerc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207