A hybrid AHP-TOPSIS for risk analysis in maritime cybersecurity based on 3D models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Emerging maritime cyber threats put Indonesia's marine technology-based systems at risk This study aims to determine the dimensions and analysis of risk assessment in maritime cyber security based on 3D models in the Indonesian sea area. A statistical descriptive qualitative method approach supported by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Technique for Order by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) methods were used in this study. Risk analysis in maritime cybersecurity has 3 (three) main criteria: Threat, Vulnerability, and consequence. Based on the results of 3D risk analysis, the six dimensions of MCS are identified as having a level of risk at Very Low and Low Risk. The highest risk value is obtained by the dimension of Cyber security-related company procedures (D2) (0.368) and the lowest risk value is Ship's systems readiness (D3) (0.048).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it