A hybrid model of spatial autoregressive-multivariate adaptive generalized Poisson regression spline
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several Multivariate Adaptive Regression Spline (MARS) approaches are available to model categorical and numerical (especially continuous) data. Currently, there are other numerical data types—discrete or count data—that call for specific consideration in modeling. Additionally, spatially correlated count data is frequently observed. This has been seen in the case of health data, for example, the number of newborn fatalities, tuberculosis patients, hospital visitors, etc. However, currently no structurally consistent nonparametric regression and MARS model for count data incorporating spatial lag autocorrelation. The SAR-MAGPRS estimator (Spatial Autoregressive - Multivariate Adaptive Generalized Poisson Regression Spline) is developed to fill this gap. Although it can be applied to different count distributions, the estimator was developed in this study under the assumption of a Generalized Poisson distribution. This paper provides an information-theoretic framework for incorporating knowledge of the spatial structure and non-parametric regression models, especially MARS for the count data types. Moreover, the proposed method can assist in modeling the number of diseases while health policies are being developed. The framework presents an application of the Penalized Least Square (PLS) method to estimate the SAR – MAGPRS model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".