MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386745343 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-41065-9_16

The Acute Need for Bathymetric Surveys

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386745343 on OpenAlexaff
Paul Van Pul

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsSaskatoon Medical Imaging
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBathymetryHydrographyGeographyCapital (architecture)Bathymetric chartOceanographyCartographyGeologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It was quickly recognized that for successful shipping, bathymetric surveys would be essential and in 1887 the first soundings were completed between Boma and Matadi. But the main problem lay in the braided section. Here it was a matter of maintaining and even improving the meandering thalwegs. So, after 1901, when the first topographical maps of the Bas-Congo became available, hydrographers had a basis to start soundings in this reach. Colonel-engineer Pierre Van Deuren, who had studied the hydrography of the Lower Congo in detail, suggested a few solutions to the problem but in fact, the first bathymetric measurements extended from the first land surveys in the vicinity of the CFS capital of Boma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.120

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAfrican history and culture studies→French-language works237,207→