MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386745696 · doi:10.18280/ijdne.180406

Optimal Rule Curves for Operation the Euphrates River Concerning Tharthar Reservoir as a Case Study

2023· article· en· W4386745696 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Dheyaa Hamdan Dagher, Imad Habeeb Obead

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and Ecodynamics · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater resources management and optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringHydrology (agriculture)Water resource managementGeologyEnvironmental scienceGeotechnical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the Discrete Differential Dynamic Programming (DDDP) method is utilized to identify the optimum rule curves and policies for the Tharthar Reservoir by adopting an objective function to reduce the release and storage losses.The input data for the optimization model represents the historical data for the Tharthar Reservoir within the Euphrates River Basin from October 2000 to September 2021.The years within this period will be categorized as two sequential wet and dry years for the reservoir operation through the development period of October 2022 to September 2059.In the first scenario, TH1, the plan is unsafe during the planning period of the operation because there is a high deficit in storage and outflow.The summation of the deficit in storage and outflow after applying the TH1 scenario is equal to 52671 million cubic meters (MCM).The second scenario, TH2, is an alternative scenario for operating the Tharthar Reservoir.The summation deficits from using TH2 are equal to 13071 MCM for storage and outflow.The results simulated for the monthly storage were compared with the measured data for a reliability test.Also, the projected water supply calculated by the optimization model by DDDP was compared with the WEAP model.From this comparison, the three statistical parameters, R 2 , NSE, and RSR, were evaluated as an acceptable level and a good agreement of the DDDP and WEAP model performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Design & Nature and EcodynamicsSame topicWater resources management and optimizationFrench-language works237,207