MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386746326 · doi:10.1201/9781003323020-198

Life-cycle design of concrete highway bridge decks under climate change

2023· book-chapter· en· W4386746326 on OpenAlexaffabout
Hamidreza Shirkhani, Zoubir Lounis, J. Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConcrete Corrosion and Durability
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)EngineeringCivil engineeringForensic engineeringTransport engineeringStructural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chloride-induced corrosion is the main deterioration mechanism that governs the service life design of many concrete structures such as concrete bridge decks in Canada. The annual average surface air temperature over Canada has warmed historically and is projected to rise approximately twice the global average due to climate change. The temperature increase will lead to an increase in the probability of corrosion initiation of reinforcing steel and a shortening of service life of concrete structures. Current approaches for life cycle design of concrete bridge decks do not consider the impact of climate change. A probabilistic and mechanistic approach is proposed and demonstrated through an illustrative test case to assess the impact of climate change on life cycle design of concrete bridge decks exposed to corrosive environments. The time-dependent probability of corrosion was found to increase with temperature. In corrosive environments, corrosion-resistant steel reinforcement and high performance concrete can be used to reduce the corrosion probability significantly in the changing climate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.702
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.082
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.164 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicConcrete Corrosion and DurabilityFrench-language works237,207