MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386746667 · doi:10.1137/22m1515884

On GSOR, the Generalized Successive Overrelaxation Method for Double Saddle-Point Problems

2023· article· en· W4386746667 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Scientific Computing · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMathematicsSaddle pointSaddleConvergence (economics)Block (permutation group theory)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsFlow (mathematics)GeometryMathematical optimization

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The generalized successive overrelaxation (GSOR) method of Bai, Parlett, and Wang [Numer. Math., 102 (2005), pp. 1–38] was designed for conventional saddle-point problems. We extend GSOR to a class of block three-by-three saddle-point problems. Based on the necessary and sufficient conditions for all roots of a real cubic polynomial to have modulus less than one, we derive convergence results under reasonable assumptions. We also analyze a class of block lower triangular preconditioners induced from GSOR and derive explicit and sharp spectral bounds for the preconditioned matrices. We report numerical experiments on test problems from the liquid crystal director model and the coupled Stokes–Darcy flow, demonstrating the usefulness of GSOR.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.796
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it