Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Konsep Jiwa telah menjadi hal yang menarik untuk di bahas di dunia modern ini. Walaupun pada hakikatnya konsep jiwa telah dibahas dalam banyak diskursus filsafat hingga tasawuf dari sepanjang Sejarah. Namun masih banyak kebingungan dalam memaknai konsep jiwa sehingga dibutuhkan pembahasan mengenai konsep jiwa. Sehingga pembahasan konsep jiwa dalam perspektif Al-Ghazali dinilai penting karena relevan dengan banyak pemikir lainnya juga relevan dengan pembahasan psikis di masa sekarang. Metode yang digunakan dalam telah ini adalah dengan menganalisiss literatur karangan para cendikiawan tentang Al-Ghazali dan penelitian ini ditujukan agar memahami konsep jiwa Al-Ghazali yang menjadi konsep yang banyak dipergunakan dalam diskursus ilmu psikologi dan tasawuf.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.023 | 0.028 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it