Bibliographic record
Abstract
Konsep Jiwa telah menjadi hal yang menarik untuk di bahas di dunia modern ini. Walaupun pada hakikatnya konsep jiwa telah dibahas dalam banyak diskursus filsafat hingga tasawuf dari sepanjang Sejarah. Namun masih banyak kebingungan dalam memaknai konsep jiwa sehingga dibutuhkan pembahasan mengenai konsep jiwa. Sehingga pembahasan konsep jiwa dalam perspektif Al-Ghazali dinilai penting karena relevan dengan banyak pemikir lainnya juga relevan dengan pembahasan psikis di masa sekarang. Metode yang digunakan dalam telah ini adalah dengan menganalisiss literatur karangan para cendikiawan tentang Al-Ghazali dan penelitian ini ditujukan agar memahami konsep jiwa Al-Ghazali yang menjadi konsep yang banyak dipergunakan dalam diskursus ilmu psikologi dan tasawuf.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.038 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".