The Differing Effects of Sleep on Ictal and Interictal Network Dynamics in Drug‐Resistant Epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Sleep has important influences on focal interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs), and the rates and spatial extent of IEDs are increased in non-rapid eye movement (NREM) sleep. In contrast, the influence of sleep on seizures is less clear, and its effects on seizure topography are poorly documented. We evaluated the influences of NREM sleep on ictal spatiotemporal dynamics and contrasted these with interictal network dynamics. METHODS: We included patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent continuous intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) with depth electrodes. Patients were selected if they had 1 to 3 seizures from each vigilance state, wakefulness and NREM sleep, within a 48-hour window, and under the same antiseizure medication. A 10-minute epoch of the interictal iEEG was selected per state, and IEDs were detected automatically. A total of 25 patients (13 women; aged 32.5 ± 7.1 years) were included. RESULTS: The seizure onset pattern, duration, spatiotemporal propagation, and latency of ictal high-frequency activity did not differ significantly between wakefulness and NREM sleep (all p > 0.05). In contrast, IED rates and spatial distribution were increased in NREM compared with wakefulness (p < 0.001, Cliff's d = 0.48 and 0.49). The spatial overlap between vigilance states was higher for seizures (57.1 ± 40.1%) than IEDs (41.7 ± 46.2%; p = 0.001, Cliff's d = 0.51). INTERPRETATION: In contrast to its effects on IEDs, NREM sleep does not affect ictal spatiotemporal dynamics. This suggests that once the brain surpasses the seizure threshold, it will follow the underlying epileptic network irrespective of the vigilance state. These findings offer valuable insights into neural network dynamics in epilepsy and have important clinical implications for localizing seizure foci. ANN NEUROL 2023.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".