« Les infirmières, ensemble : une force pour la santé mondiale », affirme haut et fort le CII lors de son congrès mondial bisannuel du 1 er au 5 juillet 2023 à Montréal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
En 2019, el Consejo Nacional de Universidades de disciplinas de la salud creó la sección «Ciencias de la enfermería». Una de sus misiones es evaluar las candidaturas de los aspirantes a la cualificación de profesor titular y de profesor asociado en un nivel universitario. Esta cualificación acredita a una persona para presentarse a un concurso para el puesto de profesor titular o profesor asociado en una universidad francesa. Los miembros de la sección deben evaluar si el candidato cumple con los requisitos en materia de investigación, docencia y experiencia para poder presentarse al concurso. Por consiguiente, hay una serie de requisitos que conviene reiterar para mejorar la calidad de las futuras candidaturas. Aquí sólo se abordarán los requisitos para obtener el título de profesor titular universitario.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".