MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386760067 · doi:10.30984/jii.v17i1.2445

Application of The Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model in Improving The Quality of Balaghah Learning in MAN 3 Jombang

2023· article· en· W4386760067 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmiah Iqra · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation and Character Development
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDocumentationData presentationQuality (philosophy)CTL*Presentation (obstetrics)Mathematics educationData collectionPsychologyProcess (computing)Computer scienceMedicineSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Indonesia, the problem that often arises in learning is that students' understanding of the material is still low, as evidenced by student learning outcomes that are still low. This is certainly not caused by the common knowledge of students alone. Still, many factors that influence one of them are the learning process that is less qualified, human resources in the form of unprofessional teachers so that students' abilities will also be low. If this continues, the output of human resources resulting from learning in Indonesia will not be able to compete with countries that are both developing. This study aims to reveal in more depth the application of the contextual teaching and learning (CTL) learning model in improving the quality of Balaghah learning at MAN 3 Jombang, with the focus of the discussion as follows 1) Planning of Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) models in improving the quality of Balaghah learning at MAN 3 Jombang, (2) the quality of Balaghah learning as the output of the application of the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model at MAN 3 Jombang. This research uses a qualitative approach, with the type of case study research in schools. Data collection was done by interview, observation, and documentation. Data analysis was done through data reduction, presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study are 1) Planning the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Model, there are three stages; first, the introduction is to see the suitability of essential competencies with methods, materials, models, media, and learning resources. Second, implementation is the student centre learning process through several stages of learning. Third, the teacher evaluates the students. 2) The quality of Balaghah learning as the output of applying the Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) model at MAN 3 Jombang is related to teacher learning behaviour, student learning behaviour, impact, learning climate, learning materials, and learning media

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it