MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4386762179 · doi:10.1002/9781119799627.ch11

Measuring Tissue Temperature with Ultrasound

2023· other· en· W4386762179 on OpenAlexaff
Elyas Shaswary, Jahangir Tavakkoli

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltrasoundAttenuationBiomedical engineeringSpeed of soundMaterials scienceSensitivity (control systems)AcousticsBiological tissueAttenuation coefficientUltrasonic sensorTherapeutic ultrasoundMedicineOpticsPhysicsElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ultrasound tissue thermometry is a method that uses ultrasound waves to estimate the temperature of the tissues during thermal therapy treatment. A robust real-time and noninvasive thermometry technique is crucial in thermal therapies for ensuring that the target area receives the right amount of heat while sparing the surrounding healthy tissue. Ultrasound is an attractive modality for tissue thermometry due to its relatively high sensitivity to changes in temperature and fast data acquisition and processing capabilities. Currently, there are several ultrasound thermometry methods for hyperthermia therapies, including temperature-driven changes in backscattered energy, radio-frequency echo shift due to the speed of sound and thermal expansion, attenuation coefficient, and acoustic harmonics. Some of the challenges when used in vivo include high sensitivity to tissue motion and tissue heterogeneity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.193
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications→French-language works237,207→