Bibliographic record
Abstract
ver the past decade, interest among an English audience in the work of French phenomenologist Michel Henry has grown considerably.While there is still relatively little secondary work done on him in English, and while a number of his works-including his significant late work Incarnation.Une philosophic de la chair1-are still untranslated, that promises to change soon.At present, interest in Henry comes primarily from students of phenomenology, as well as from those interested in the so-called 'return of religion' in Continental thought since the last quarter of the 20th century.For those interested in the relation of the phenomenological method to this return of religion, one of the main issues is how phenomenology itself is being redefined and expanded to address new modes of phenomenality, including what has been called by Henry and others 'invisible phenomenality'.This paper will examine the unfolding of this redefined phenomenology in Henry's work; it will consider especially what methodological difficulties arise for Henry in his unfolding of what is defined by him as 'affective phenomenality' as the key to fundamental ontology.In doing so, it will also address what has been referred to as the "theological turn" of Henry's thinking in his attempt to solve those difficulties.1.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.134 | 0.059 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".