Bibliographic record
Abstract
or many individuals who are familiar with the work of Franco-Algerian philosopher Albert Camus, the idea of le bonheur Camusien seems absurd in itself.Known for his typically dour disposition and writing style, Camus was about as happy as Leo Tolstoy.Camus, like Tolstoy, was what American psychologist William James might have labelled as a sick soul.Yet the theme of happiness is in several ways central to many of Albert Camus7 writings.Pierre Nguyen-van-Huy, writing a doctoral thesis on the topic of metaphysics and happiness in Camus7 thought, distinguishes three different levels of happiness in Camus7 works.The first level, which he baptises 'physical happiness7, is largely hedonistic, referring to pleasures derived from sensual experience, and is developed in texts such as Noces and L'Ete.The second level is humanistic happiness, dealing with joy derived from the individual's relationships with other people around him or her and with the world in itself.This idea finds its shape in Camus7 works entitled La peste and Les justes.The final form of happiness, and perhaps the most interesting in an existential context, is metaphysical happiness.While Nguyen-van-Huy suggests that these three forms of happiness develop simultaneously throughout Camus7 works and are essentially inseparable from one another (Nguyen-van-Huy 1968, 7), it is this last level of metaphysical happiness that is emphasised in L'homme revolte and Le mythe de Sisyphe.It is in this highest plane of joyful existence that the concept of the absurd comes to the fore, marring the individual's relationship with metaphysical 'forms' such as justice and peace.This level belongs to the individual who tries to grant meaning to a life that is devoid of God.Le mythe de Sisyphe itself, published in Paris by Gallimard in 1942, can be viewed as a self-contained handbook to happiness.Combining both theory and practice, the text seeks to provide an avenue for happiness that goes beyond mere speculation or contemplation, but that is rather ARC,
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.015 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".