MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bilateral Tibial Tubercle Avulsion Fractures With an Associated Patellar Tendon Avulsion in an Adolescent Patient

2023· article· en· W4386764700 on OpenAlexaff
James H. Dove, Giancarlo Medina Pérez, Alexandre Boulos, Craig P. Eberson

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAOS Global Research and Reviews · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports injuries and prevention
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTubercleAvulsionSurgeryPhysisAvulsion fracturePatellar tendonTendonRange of motionKirschner wireInternal fixationRadiography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tibial tubercle fractures in pediatric patients are increasing in frequency as more children participate in sports. These injuries are often seen in boys engaging in jumping activities before closure of their proximal tibial physis. Bilateral tibial tubercle fractures have been reported in the literature, but less frequent are associated patellar tendon ruptures with fracture of the tubercle. In this case report, we present an 11-year-old girl who sustained bilateral tibial tubercle fractures, including an associated patellar tendon rupture from the tubercle on the right lower extremity. We describe our technique for the management of both injuries, which included a primary patellar tendon repair for the right leg and Kirschner wire fixation of the displaced tubercle for the left leg. The patient ultimately had a successful outcome at the final follow-up with healed fractures and full range of motion of both knees. In this case report, we also present similar cases from the literature and the differing treatment strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.435
Teacher spread0.355 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAOS Global Research and ReviewsSame topicSports injuries and preventionFrench-language works237,207