Toshihiko Izutsu and the Philosophy of WORD: In Search of the Spritual Orient, by Eisuke Wakamatsu
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eisuke Wakamatsu's intellectual biography of Toshihiko Izutsu is the only resource of its kind available concerning the late Japanese scholar.This alone ought to make this work indispensable for anyone interested in Izutsu's life and thought.It also contains a useful chronology, as well as a complete bibliography of Izutsu's works.Wakamatsu's background in literary criticism can be felt throughout the book.The work is a dance between philosophy and poetry, and this is exactly what Wakamatsu wishes to convey about Izutsu as well (p.xvi).The breadth of Wakamatsu's research is impressive; he uses archival material and looks extensively into the resources Izutsu read and worked with.The result is a complex web of ideas and connections that are bound together "synchronically."What does the Muslim mystic Ibn 'Arabi have in common with Lao-tzu?And what do they both have to do with Izutsu?Wakamatsu carefully crafts a narrative that prepares us to confront this and similar questions that Izutsu had.Wakamatsu situates Izutsu's intellectual biography between structuralism and the worldview of the existential phenomenologist of religion, but he also contextualizes it in the framework of the Japanese reception of Western philosophy and literature, as well as in the centrality of language in understanding other cultural and religious structures.The book can be divided into three main parts: the first part (chapters 1-5), traces the sources that influenced and contributed to the formation of Izutsu's thought, and follows him until he leaves Japan in 1964.Wakamatsu identifies four main sources for this period, namely Greek philosophy, Islam, Russian literature, and Catholic and French literature.While Buddhism is present to Izutsu since childhood, it does not become a prominent interest of his until later in life.In all these topics, the themes of prophecy and poetrythe saint and the poet -make a constant appearance.Wakamatsu insists that poetry, mysticism, and shamanism are the building blocks for Izutsu's understanding of religious phenomena.Here Socrates, Plato, Ibn Hallaj, Paul Valéry, Dostoevsky as well as Louis Massignon are some of the thinkers who provide context and shape to Izutsu's theories.It is also at this early stage that Izutsu writes a biography of the Prophet Muhammad and publishes the first Arabic to Japanese translation of the Qur'an.Wakamatsu
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".