Web Connector: A Unified API Wrapper to Simplify Web Data Collection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Collecting structured data from Web APIs, such as the Twitter API, Yelp Fusion API, Spotify API, and DBLP API, is a common task in the data science lifecycle, but it requires advanced programming skills for data scientists. To simplify web data collection and lower the barrier to entry, API wrappers have been developed to wrap API calls into easy-to-use functions. However, existing API wrappers are not standardized, which means that users must download and maintain multiple API wrappers and learn how to use each of them, while developers must spend considerable time creating an API wrapper for any new website. In this demo, we present the Web Connector, which unifies API wrappers to overcome these limitations. First, the Web Connector has an easy-to-use program-ming interface, designed to provide a user experience similar to that of reading data from relational databases. Second, the Web Connector's novel system architecture requires minimal effort to fetch data for end-users with an existing API description file. Third, the Web Connector includes a semi-automatic API description file generator that leverages the concept of generation by example to create new API wrappers without writing code.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".