MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4386768836 · doi:10.3233/idt-220295

HT-WSO: A hybrid meta-heuristic approach-aided multi-objective constraints for energy efficient routing in WBANs

2023· article· en· W4386768836 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntelligent Decision Technologies · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Body Area Networks
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRouting protocolSwarm behaviourHeuristicRouting (electronic design automation)Network packetData transmissionEfficient energy useComputer networkDistributed computingEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Generally, Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) are regarded as the collection of small sensor devices that are effectively implanted or embedded into the human body. Moreover, the nodes included in the WBAN have large resource constraints. Hence, reliable and energy-efficient data transmission plays a significant role in the implementation and in constructing of most of the merging applications. Regarded to complicated channel environment, limited power supply, as well as varying link connectivity has made the construction of WBANs routing protocol become difficult. In order to provide the routing protocol in a high energy-efficient manner, a new approach is suggested using hybrid meta-heuristic development. Initially, all the sensor nodes in WBAN are considered for experimentation. In general, the WBAN is comprised of mobile nodes as well as fixed sensor nodes. Since the existing models are ineffective to achieve high energy efficiency, the new routing protocol is developed by proposing the Hybrid Tunicate-Whale Swarm Optimization (HT-WSO) algorithm. Subsequently, the proposed work considers the multiple constraints for deriving the objective function. The network efficiency is analyzed using the objective function that is formulated by distance, hop count, energy, path loss, and load and packet loss ratio. To attain the optimum value, the HT-WSO derived from Tunicate Swarm Algorithm (TSA) and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) is employed. In the end, the ability of the working model is estimated by diverse parameters and compared with existing traditional approaches. The simulation outcome of the designed method achieves 13.3%, 23.5%, 25.7%, and 27.7% improved performance than DHOA, Jaya, TSA, and WOA. Thus, the results illustrate that the recommended protocol attains better energy efficiency over WBANs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.909
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it