MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> Waiting Point Relevant for X-Ray Burst Nucleosynthesis via the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Mg</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>α</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Al</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math> Reaction

2023· article· lv· W4386770326 on OpenAlexaff
H. Jayatissa, M. L. Avila, K. E. Rehm, P. Mohr, Z. Meisel, J. Chen, C. R. Hoffman, J. F. Liang, C. Müller-Gatermann, D. Neto, W.-J. Ong, A. Psaltis, D. Santiago-Gonzalez, T. L. Tang, C. Ugalde, G. L. Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2023
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersArgonne National LaboratoryLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsNemzeti Kutatási Fejlesztési és Innovációs HivatalNational Nuclear Security AdministrationOffice of ScienceDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsNucleosynthesisPhysicsIonizationAstrophysicsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Atomic physicsIonNuclear reactionChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ^{22}Mg(α,p)^{25}Al reaction rate has been identified as a major source of uncertainty for understanding the nucleosynthesis flow in Type-I x-ray bursts. We report a direct measurement of the energy- and angle-integrated cross sections of this reaction in a 3.3-6.9 MeV center-of-mass energy range using the MUlti-Sampling Ionization Chamber (MUSIC). The new ^{22}Mg(α,p)^{25}Al reaction rate is a factor of ∼4 higher than the previous direct measurement of this reaction within temperatures relevant for x-ray bursts, resulting in the ^{22}Mg waiting point of x-ray burst nucleosynthesis flow to be significantly bypassed via the (α,p) reaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.835
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0060.011
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.012
Bibliometrics0.0030.007
Science and technology studies0.0100.011
Scholarly communication0.0090.009
Open science0.0140.014
Research integrity0.0090.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.6190.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207